January 12, 2016
Wind turbines don’t have to all look the same. Here are some that are helping cities go green—and look like art in the process
Although a lot of people are excited about wind energy, few are excited about the pinwheel-shaped machines that often produce it. Branded as noisy, blamed for spoiling bucolic views and proven deadly to some bats and migrating birds, the giant, white-bladed horizontal axis wind turbines that now dot the landscape of the American West have earned a fair number of detractors—even among environmentalists who generally favor renewable power.
But what if you turned the idea sideways, and created a turbine that could spin like a carousel? And what if you made a turbine small enough to sit on top of a building or inside an urban park? Could the result produce enough power to really matter?
The idea isn’t a new one—people have been playing with windmill designs and experimenting with alternatives to the horizontal axis turbine for almost a century now. But in the last two decades, a flurry of interest in expanding renewable energy in cities has attracted the attention of a large number of inventors and artists, many of whom see the vertical axis wind turbine as promising.
There is no single design for these upended wind catchers, but all share one key aspect: the blades turn around an axis that points skyward. And unlike their horizontal brethren, the components and associated generators of a vertical turbine are placed at its base, giving it a lower center of gravity. Most are also relatively small, and unlike horizontal units, they can be grouped very closely together to optimize efficiency.
In many large cities, including New York, San Francisco, Boston and Chicago, city officials and scientists have been studying vertical axis turbines and contemplating their use. Paris has embraced the notion with enthusiasm, even allowing two giant turbines of this type to be installed within the steel latticework of the Eiffel Tower, which might someday generate enough electricity to power the ground floor of the tourist attraction. Some private firms worldwide have begun integrating vertical axis turbines into architectural plans for commercial buildings.
But vertical turbines have also attracted a sizable number of skeptics and naysayers.
“You can make a [vertical axis wind turbine] that will produce electricity,” says Robert Preus, a researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Colorado who helped develop certification criteria for small wind turbines in the U.S. “The question is whether or not you can do so competitively.”
There hasn’t been enough research to make vertical turbines durable and affordable, Preus points out. Not enough is known yet about how long the equipment will last, and there’s not always a solid guarantee of return on investment. There also aren’t enough of these machines being produced commercially to bring down the price, which remains stubbornly high—in some cases running into tens of thousands of dollars per unit. Many questions remain unanswered about how much energy a small vertical turbine on top of a building can produce. And although enthusiasts claim that the smaller vertical turbines don’t kill flying animals such as birds, there has not been a great deal of data gathered yet about their overall impact on wildlife.
There is, however, an abundance of people willing to experiment, sometimes via shaky financial backing, with the emerging turbine technology. The Internet is littered with websites for now-bankrupt companies, proclaiming the glory of these machines and their capabilities, as well as an almost endless list of enthusiastic articles, often full of myths about them. In some cases, those stories may be overstating their potential, or using outdated information to present an inaccurate portrait of them.
One of the most popular misconceptions, says engineer Richard Cochrane from Exeter University in the UK, is that all vertical axis wind turbines are silent, or at least less noisy than all of their horizontal counterparts on large wind farms.
“There are some vertical axis machines that are very noisy, because they didn’t put into so much effort into the aerodynamics of the machine,” Cochrane says. There are also some newly developed horizontal axis turbines that are incredibly quiet.
For several years, Cochrane was part of a team working on a machine called the Quiet Revolution. His research team placed prototypes in more than 200 different locations throughout the UK, including on the top of school buildings, in suburban parks and on the edge of shopping center parking lots, all the while measuring both performance and energy production and gathering feedback on issues like noise and aesthetics. He was able to gather an enormous amount of information about the potential of small vertical turbines before pulling out of the project after becoming frustrated by an investor’s push to take the turbine to market quickly.
Some engineers have voiced skepticism, for example, about the potential of harnessing wind power in built-up areas. Buildings and trees tend to cause turbulence and reduce steady currents, especially at ground level or on rooftops. But there were several locations on the outskirts of towns and near the seaside where Cochrane and his team were able to get strong, steady, reliable wind, even on top of buildings.
“We ended up kind of jokingly referring to it as the machine for suburban wind, rather than urban wind,” Cochrane says.
Either way, the vertical design seems to inspire a lot of sculptural engineering. Horizontal blades turning toward a person on the ground may set off a subconsciously intimidating feel. But vertical blades, by contrast, are often said to be mesmerizing, peaceful and relaxing to watch. They are often mistaken for public art.
Cochrane recalls that one of his former study sites was in a parking lot outside of a busy grocery store. When a relatively small horizontal turbine was put into place there, customers parked far away from it. But when that machine was replaced with a vertical axis turbine, the store’s manager noticed that everyone would park underneath it and look up.
“The noise of the old machine might have put people off,” Cochrane says. But to him it seemed like more of a subconscious thing. “They liked to see the vertical one turning.”
La Tour Verte
UGE was also hired to install two giant vertical axis wind turbines on the second level of the Eiffel Tower in Paris in February of 2015. Although the company was initially worried about negative public reaction, the French people were “extremely positive” in their response to the installation, says Gromadzki. Even so, designers and engineers spent a good deal of time working to make the blades blend in to the structure’s elaborate metal work, and were careful to use the exact same shade of paint used on the tower’s exterior so as not to mar its appearance from below. Each turbine is capable of producing 10,000 kilowatt-hours of energy per year; over time this may be enough energy to power the first floor of the popular and iconic tourist attraction. The project is currently being monitored to see how well the system works.
The Wind Tree
The French company New Wind made headlines in early 2015 when it announced plans to install one of its 26 foot-tall “wind trees” in the Place de la Concorde in Paris. (This photo, however, was taken at a New Wind installation at Le Bourget during the COP21 climate talks.) The trees are made of plastic branches, each topped by a green leaf-like turbine blade. According to their designer, Jérôme Michaud-Larivière, these vertical axis turbines are capable of producing 2,400 kilowatt-hours annually—enough to light 71 exterior parking spaces.
Wind’s In Their Genes
High atop the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation building in downtown Oklahoma City, these 18 vertical axis turbines, each 18.5 feet tall, were designed to mimic the shape of DNA strands in order to highlight the work going on inside the offices. The building was designed by the architectural firm of Perkins + Will and awarded Gold status by the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design program. The company that initially designed and engineered the turbines went out of business before the building was completed in 2012, but installation was supervised by SWG Energy of Dallas.
Initial reports incorrectly indicated that the turbines would produce a total of 85,500 kilowatt-hours of energy annually; in reality each of the turbines now produces about 1,000 kilowatt-hours of energy each year for a total of 18,000, less than 25 percent of the original projection. The project’s failure to deliver the promised amount of electricity demonstrates just how much feverish enthusiasm seems to swirl around these turbines. But despite the difference in performance, those involved say the turbines have helped to highlight the building’s overall green design, and unlike the other green features, they are outwardly visible to anyone passing through the city. “It’s an iconic renewable energy system on the top of a building,” says Joseph Willix, President of SWG. “Everybody knows the research tower now, because of the wind turbines.”
In Iceland, extreme winter weather conditions pose special challenges to those seeking to use wind for power production. Gusts are plentiful, but so are low temperatures, which cause turbines to freeze up. A company known as IceWind has been testing small vertical axis wind turbines for several years, and currently sells two models: one for those who need to heat a small cabin or run a small farm and another that can be used to power surveillance or telecom towers. These small, vaguely castle-like units, made in a variety of colors, are touted as being able to melt and shed ice easily, before it can interfere with power production. Company founder and engineer Saethor Asgeirsson estimates that each of these small turbines can produce on average 1,000 to 1,800 kilowatt-hours annually, depending on location.